Conservation Reserve Program in Asotin County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 301
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Asotin County, Washington totaled $44,662,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Pamela R Ausman Trust | Vancouver, WA 98682 | $217,816 |
62 | Janice C Botts | Anatone, WA 99401 | $217,060 |
63 | James F Fitzgerald | Cheney, WA 99004 | $199,642 |
64 | Roy Hoar | Canoga Park, CA 91304 | $197,447 |
65 | Dodd Farms | Anatone, WA 99401 | $196,947 |
66 | Wayne Heitstuman | Anatone, WA 99401 | $192,818 |
67 | Steve Heitstuman | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $192,818 |
68 | Richard Luhn | Asotin, WA 99402 | $184,708 |
69 | Marcia A Luhn | Asotin, WA 99402 | $184,703 |
70 | Yochum Farm LLC | Terrace, WA 98043 | $182,720 |
71 | Charlotte L Peterson | Forks, WA 98331 | $180,666 |
72 | Wayne Bezona | Lewiston, ID 83501 | $178,231 |
73 | Jim Weissenfels Estate | Valleyford, WA 99036 | $172,870 |
74 | Hendrickson Ranch | Asotin, WA 99402 | $170,191 |
75 | State Of Wash Dnr | Ellensburg, WA 98926 | $164,262 |
76 | Jonathan Coe | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $161,736 |
77 | Dodd Farms | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $153,945 |
78 | Neil Ausman | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $151,963 |
79 | Couse Creek Ranch LLC | Anatone, WA 99401 | $150,136 |
80 | Nick Egland | Lewiston, ID 83501 | $148,806 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”