Production Flexibility Program in Benton County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 385
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Benton County, Washington totaled $17,861,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Cotswold Farms Inc | Kennewick, WA 99337 | $226,994 |
22 | Poeckes Rd Partnership | Pasco, WA 99301 | $226,189 |
23 | Harry G Owens Ranch Inc | Kennewick, WA 99336 | $224,897 |
24 | Wirth Brothers Inc | Kennewick, WA 99336 | $217,219 |
25 | Bateman Family Properties LLC | Kennewick, WA 99337 | $215,155 |
26 | The Berg Partnership | Paterson, WA 99345 | $213,348 |
27 | Keith L Burkhart | Prosser, WA 99350 | $211,061 |
28 | S&r Smith Bros | Prosser, WA 99350 | $209,946 |
29 | Nehls & Son Inc | Prosser, WA 99350 | $205,122 |
30 | Carlsons Inc | Richland, WA 99352 | $200,548 |
31 | Andrews & Rowell | Prosser, WA 99350 | $200,254 |
32 | Allan B Simmelink | Kennewick, WA 99338 | $198,094 |
33 | Mercer Dryland Farms Lp | Prosser, WA 99350 | $197,211 |
34 | B & B Farms | Kennewick, WA 99336 | $188,474 |
35 | Custom Agricultural Services Inc | Paterson, WA 99345 | $179,321 |
36 | Deffenbaugh Custom Farms | Kennewick, WA 99337 | $177,797 |
37 | State Of Wash Dnr | Ellensburg, WA 98926 | $177,557 |
38 | Pearson Farms | Prosser, WA 99350 | $177,366 |
39 | Jeff Blair | Prosser, WA 99350 | $177,147 |
40 | Lenzie Ranch Inc | Paterson, WA 99345 | $164,062 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”