Farm Subsidy information
Chelan County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Chelan County, Washington, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 194
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chelan County, Washington totaled $9,774,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R & S Orchards LLC | Cashmere, WA 98815 | $71,469 |
22 | Mar-d Inc | Chelan, WA 98816 | $69,408 |
23 | Lake Inc | Wenatchee, WA 98807 | $69,116 |
24 | Hc Orchards LLC | Wenatchee, WA 98807 | $66,240 |
25 | Herold E Peebles | Chelan, WA 98816 | $65,078 |
26 | Hedeen Orchard Company LLC | Malaga, WA 98828 | $64,882 |
27 | Triple Threat Orchards LLC | Wenatchee, WA 98807 | $64,667 |
28 | R Fry Orchard Inc | Malaga, WA 98828 | $63,515 |
29 | Kenoyer Orchards Partnership | Cashmere, WA 98815 | $59,933 |
30 | Cascade Premium Orchards LLC | Wenatchee, WA 98801 | $58,338 |
31 | Sergio Hernandez | Wenatchee, WA 98801 | $57,216 |
32 | Greg C Oules | Chelan, WA 98816 | $55,587 |
33 | John W Senseney Jr | Wenatchee, WA 98801 | $54,977 |
34 | Triple P Orchard/peebles Peebles & Peebles | Chelan, WA 98816 | $54,304 |
35 | Richard A Smithson | Peshastin, WA 98847 | $53,618 |
36 | Kludt-waldron Orchards Inc | Manson, WA 98831 | $49,959 |
37 | Bell Family Legacy LLC | Malaga, WA 98828 | $49,458 |
38 | Dave Yonaka Orchard Inc | Wenatchee, WA 98801 | $49,181 |
39 | Hacienda De Gonzalez Inc | E Wenatchee, WA 98802 | $48,976 |
40 | Double P Orchard LLC | Wenatchee, WA 98801 | $45,927 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”