Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Clallam County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 107
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Clallam County, Washington totaled $982,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Vernon Soeneke Sr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $5,642 |
42 | Elizabeth Buckingham | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $5,208 |
43 | Quentin E Vitalis | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $5,009 |
44 | Gary L Peterson | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $4,773 |
45 | Chestoqua Peterson | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $4,640 |
46 | Matthew T Chapman | Sequim, WA 98382 | $4,592 |
47 | Kory Murphy | Forks, WA 98331 | $3,666 |
48 | Michael Buckingham | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $3,442 |
49 | Roland A Gagnon Sr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $3,303 |
50 | Michael Wiechman | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $2,957 |
51 | Jeanette Morningstarr Wiechman | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $2,841 |
52 | Neil Lyons Sr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,801 |
53 | Robert Whiteshield Jr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,773 |
54 | Joseph A Daniels | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,766 |
55 | Christopher Lachester | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,543 |
56 | Anthony Lawrence | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,533 |
57 | Morgan M Buzzell | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,356 |
58 | Erik Lee Peterson | Joyce, WA 98343 | $2,326 |
59 | Christopher Lee Cameron | Forks, WA 98331 | $2,320 |
60 | Evan Norbisrath | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $2,317 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”