Farm Subsidy information
Clallam County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Clallam County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 124
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clallam County, Washington totaled $1,237,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jeanette Morningstarr Wiechman | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $2,841 |
62 | Neil Lyons Sr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,801 |
63 | Robert Whiteshield Jr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,773 |
64 | Joseph A Daniels | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,766 |
65 | Christopher Lachester | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,543 |
66 | Anthony Lawrence | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,533 |
67 | Morgan M Buzzell | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,356 |
68 | Erik Lee Peterson | Joyce, WA 98343 | $2,326 |
69 | Christopher Lee Cameron | Forks, WA 98331 | $2,320 |
70 | Evan Norbisrath | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $2,317 |
71 | Robert D Arnold | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,315 |
72 | Anthony Rascon | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,235 |
73 | Joshua Richardson | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,207 |
74 | Brian Parker | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,163 |
75 | Mitchell C Mcgee Jr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $1,913 |
76 | Elisabeth De Groot Reynolds | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $1,903 |
77 | Michael W Shaw | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $1,730 |
78 | Frank J Gonzales Jr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $1,690 |
79 | Brad Alan Balderson | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $1,596 |
80 | Michael Wilson Mcfarland | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $1,554 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”