Total Commodity Programs in Clallam County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 154
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clallam County, Washington totaled $3,332,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Maple View Farm LLC | Sequim, WA 98382 | $907,625 |
2 | Hermann Brothers Logging & Constr | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $361,054 |
3 | Dba Native Trust LLC | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $279,663 |
4 | Interfor Pacific Inc | Bellingham, WA 98226 | $184,538 |
5 | Wa'atch Inc | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $162,586 |
6 | Sequim Valley Farms Inc | Sequim, WA 98382 | $145,500 |
7 | Jerry K D Schmidt | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $141,217 |
8 | Willow-wist Farm, Inc | Sequim, WA 98382 | $127,088 |
9 | Elida Smith | Sequim, WA 98382 | $90,092 |
10 | Terry D Arnold Jr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $70,833 |
11 | Green Creek Wood Products LLC | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $63,600 |
12 | David Sones | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $52,705 |
13 | Matthew Leif Chester Jr | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $44,410 |
14 | B.p Fishing Inc | Sequim, WA 98382 | $40,812 |
15 | Wallace E Hinderer | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $27,879 |
16 | Lonnie F Booth | Sequim, WA 98382 | $26,234 |
17 | Eric Bradley Adolphsen | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $21,237 |
18 | Joseph B Luce Sr | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $17,101 |
19 | Nathaniel D Olson | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $16,691 |
20 | Mad Jax Seafood Inc | Sequim, WA 98382 | $16,355 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>