Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Columbia County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 277
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Columbia County, Washington totaled $2,195,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | M Lewis Talbott | Prescott, WA 99348 | $28,555 |
22 | Ingram Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $26,527 |
23 | W M J & Son Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $25,348 |
24 | D & M Farming Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $24,779 |
25 | Deruwe L & F Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $22,553 |
26 | Lambert Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $22,240 |
27 | Djp Farms, Inc | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $21,910 |
28 | Roger Gibbons | Dayton, WA 99328 | $21,780 |
29 | Howard Hills, Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $21,395 |
30 | Warren Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $21,279 |
31 | Talbott Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $20,721 |
32 | Clayton J Hutchens | Dayton, WA 99328 | $19,286 |
33 | John Laib | Dayton, WA 99328 | $18,384 |
34 | Carolyn A Laib | Dayton, WA 99328 | $18,380 |
35 | Ronald D Harting | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $18,062 |
36 | Tom Archer | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $17,622 |
37 | Deruwe Rd Farms Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $16,751 |
38 | Eslick Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $15,640 |
39 | Lambert Family Ranch Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $15,345 |
40 | W Eric Thorn | Dayton, WA 99328 | $15,247 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”