Total Conservation Programs in Columbia County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 217
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Columbia County, Washington totaled $2,083,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Diana Mcnamara | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $18,032 |
42 | Starbuck Ranch LLC | Dayton, WA 99328 | $17,718 |
43 | Schumacher Ag Air | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $17,467 |
44 | Archer Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $17,272 |
45 | Bo-j Farms Partnership | Dayton, WA 99328 | $16,392 |
46 | Polly Farm LLC | Berkeley, CA 94708 | $15,953 |
47 | Howard Family Ranch LLC | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $15,022 |
48 | Bill Blessinger | Dayton, WA 99328 | $13,963 |
49 | Ingram Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $13,646 |
50 | Watson Farms Trust | Canton, MI 48187 | $12,836 |
51 | Candice Harrison | Starbuck, WA 99359 | $12,809 |
52 | Hg Etc LLC | Dayton, WA 99328 | $12,118 |
53 | Phillip George | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $11,012 |
54 | Smith Hollow LLC | Dayton, WA 99328 | $10,960 |
55 | David K Cadman | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $9,777 |
56 | Seney Land & Livestock Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $9,683 |
57 | Deruwe Rd Farms Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $9,643 |
58 | Allen Family Ranch LLC | Spokane, WA 99223 | $9,418 |
59 | Turner Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $9,404 |
60 | Murillo Living Trust | Kennewick, WA 99337 | $8,944 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”