Conservation Reserve Program in Columbia County, Washington, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 202
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Columbia County, Washington totaled $1,932,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Barbara L Danforth | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $1,439 |
122 | Patti E Eaton | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,424 |
123 | Julie Deruwe | Olympia, WA 98502 | $1,424 |
124 | Carmen Yunker | Longmont, CO 80503 | $1,424 |
125 | Margaret Deruwe Martin | San Jose, CA 95124 | $1,424 |
126 | Bar Z Ranch | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,344 |
127 | Whitman College | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $1,311 |
128 | Shoun Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,306 |
129 | Lester A Literal | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,244 |
130 | Kay Aiken | Tucson, AZ 85739 | $1,220 |
131 | Becky J Leventis | Vancouver, WA 98665 | $1,220 |
132 | David M Snedeker | Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 | $1,214 |
133 | Mark K Lambert | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,167 |
134 | Sheri Lambert | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,167 |
135 | Sm Ringhoffer Heirs Agency | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $1,161 |
136 | Val A Kiefer | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,146 |
137 | Michael J Mathews | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,126 |
138 | Bernard B White | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,050 |
139 | Glenn Warren | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,040 |
140 | Carolyn A Laib | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,020 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”