Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Columbia County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 330
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Columbia County, Washington totaled $13,402,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ingram Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $139,204 |
22 | Lambert Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $133,285 |
23 | Turner Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $124,544 |
24 | Hanger Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $122,636 |
25 | Deruwe Rd Farms Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $121,906 |
26 | Whitman College | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $121,008 |
27 | M Lewis Talbott | Prescott, WA 99348 | $119,315 |
28 | Robinette Ranches Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $111,029 |
29 | Richard W Jones | Dayton, WA 99328 | $108,756 |
30 | Eugene Warren | Dayton, WA 99328 | $108,753 |
31 | W Eric Thorn | Dayton, WA 99328 | $107,735 |
32 | Glenn Warren | Dayton, WA 99328 | $106,983 |
33 | James M Neace | Dayton, WA 99328 | $102,687 |
34 | Abbey Farms Inc | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $102,238 |
35 | I2i LLC | Dayton, WA 99328 | $101,143 |
36 | John Grant And Son | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $93,758 |
37 | Bill Blessinger | Dayton, WA 99328 | $93,360 |
38 | Robert Warren | Dayton, WA 99328 | $90,642 |
39 | S Lightning Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $89,564 |
40 | Whetstone Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $87,760 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”