Total Disaster Programs in Douglas County, Washington, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 477
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Douglas County, Washington totaled $16,074,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Orondo Orchard Inc | Wenatchee, WA 98807 | $152,605 |
22 | Malone Farms Jv | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $148,615 |
23 | Murison Farms Joint Venture | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $138,669 |
24 | Rock Rose Farms Inc | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $136,157 |
25 | Ernesto Villa Jr | Rock Island, WA 98850 | $131,315 |
26 | Tanneberg & Son Joint Venture | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $131,208 |
27 | S & V Orchards LLC | East Wenatchee, WA 98802 | $130,249 |
28 | Jmt Joint Venture | East Wenatchee, WA 98802 | $127,279 |
29 | Polson Farms Joint Venture | Waterville, WA 98858 | $125,536 |
30 | Mcdougall & Sons Inc | Wenatchee, WA 98801 | $122,789 |
31 | D & D Roberts Jv | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $115,468 |
32 | Stoddard Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $113,963 |
33 | Matthiesen Farms Inc | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $111,222 |
34 | Simmons Orchard LLC | Wenatchee, WA 98807 | $110,440 |
35 | L & M Joint Venture | Waterville, WA 98858 | $110,286 |
36 | Delrio Farms Inc | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $110,171 |
37 | Daling Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $109,222 |
38 | 3t | Waterville, WA 98858 | $106,510 |
39 | Egbert Cattle Co LLC | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $104,732 |
40 | Mkb Orchards LLC | Brewster, WA 98812 | $99,718 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”