Total Commodity Programs in Douglas County, Washington, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 415
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Douglas County, Washington totaled $3,048,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gormley Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $38,046 |
22 | A & L Ranch Joint Venture | Waterville, WA 98858 | $37,716 |
23 | Lane Leonard | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $37,371 |
24 | Mardelle Jordan | Waterville, WA 98858 | $36,471 |
25 | Cw Bar Ranches | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $35,768 |
26 | Davis & Davis Farms | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $35,492 |
27 | Lee Roy Jordan | Waterville, WA 98858 | $35,110 |
28 | Double I Ranch | Waterville, WA 98858 | $34,976 |
29 | Rcm Farms LLC | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $32,498 |
30 | Daling Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $29,473 |
31 | Baseline Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $28,586 |
32 | Heath Jordan | Waterville, WA 98858 | $28,232 |
33 | Kerry & Ward Glessner Ptr K-w Farms Joint Venture | Chelan, WA 98816 | $28,028 |
34 | Mccray Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $27,210 |
35 | Starbeam Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $27,201 |
36 | Banrac LLC | Spokane, WA 99224 | $26,806 |
37 | 4 I Ranch LLC | Waterville, WA 98858 | $26,628 |
38 | State Of Wash Dnr | Ellensburg, WA 98926 | $25,131 |
39 | Lo-di Farms Inc | Chelan, WA 98816 | $24,590 |
40 | Luke R Lillquist | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $24,122 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”