Farm Subsidy information
Douglas County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Douglas County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,218
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Douglas County, Washington totaled $542,961,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adams Farm Partnership | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $7,867,604 |
| 2 | Bromiley Brothers Ranch | East Wenatchee, WA 98802 | $5,486,456 |
| 3 | State Of Wash Dnr | Ellensburg, WA 98926 | $4,085,276 |
| 4 | Tom Davis Farms Joint Venture | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $3,862,577 |
| 5 | Pacific Plains Partnership | Waterville, WA 98858 | $3,547,425 |
| 6 | Cavadini Partnership | Bridgeport, WA 98813 | $3,534,573 |
| 7 | Jorgensen Farms Joint Venture | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $3,399,768 |
| 8 | Jorgensen Brothers Joint Venture | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $3,287,698 |
| 9 | L & M Joint Venture | Waterville, WA 98858 | $3,092,268 |
| 10 | Hinderer Trio | Waterville, WA 98858 | $3,010,242 |
| 11 | Jbs Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $2,835,197 |
| 12 | Triple S Farms | Normandy Park, WA 98166 | $2,564,505 |
| 13 | Murison Farms Joint Venture | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $2,507,842 |
| 14 | Matthiesen Farms Inc | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $2,503,955 |
| 15 | Nelson Farms Joint Venture | Waterville, WA 98858 | $2,384,290 |
| 16 | Irmer Farms | Waterville, WA 98858 | $2,259,347 |
| 17 | Brandt Farms Joint Venture | Waterville, WA 98858 | $2,203,496 |
| 18 | Daling Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $2,200,076 |
| 19 | Polson Farms Joint Venture | Waterville, WA 98858 | $2,061,715 |
| 20 | Clements Farms Inc | East Wenatchee, WA 98802 | $1,931,789 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
