Farm Subsidy information
Douglas County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Douglas County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,218
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Douglas County, Washington totaled $542,961,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Pixlee Farms Inc | Ephrata, WA 98823 | $1,544,343 |
42 | Sherwood J Egbert | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $1,543,353 |
43 | Mardelle Jordan | Waterville, WA 98858 | $1,540,586 |
44 | Larry Nordby | Chelan, WA 98816 | $1,537,239 |
45 | Richard Rice | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $1,527,769 |
46 | Alex Mclean | Wenatchee, WA 98801 | $1,521,043 |
47 | Larry E Glessner | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $1,520,360 |
48 | Derek Hunt | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $1,518,376 |
49 | Open Heart Ranch | Bridgeport, WA 98813 | $1,496,315 |
50 | Double P Ranch Jv | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $1,487,006 |
51 | A & L Ranch Joint Venture | Waterville, WA 98858 | $1,476,962 |
52 | Gary D Poole | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $1,441,906 |
53 | Bonita Poole | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $1,438,844 |
54 | Eugene Weimerskirch | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $1,437,397 |
55 | Ward A Glessner | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $1,424,750 |
56 | Rebecca M Long | Ephrata, WA 98823 | $1,422,478 |
57 | Kathleen Rice | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $1,406,077 |
58 | Nancy Glessner | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $1,375,724 |
59 | Rafter 20 Ranch Inc | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $1,375,499 |
60 | Kujo Inc | Spokane, WA 99223 | $1,324,726 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”