Counter Cyclical Program in Douglas County, Washington, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 765
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Douglas County, Washington totaled $223,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mardelle Jordan | Waterville, WA 98858 | $2,215 |
22 | David Davis Farms Inc | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $2,188 |
23 | Larry Tanneberg Farm Inc | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $2,131 |
24 | Evans Brothers Joint Venture | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $2,072 |
25 | Big Buck Little Dough Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $1,968 |
26 | Buob Farms Inc | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $1,788 |
27 | Thomas Stahl | Ellensburg, WA 98926 | $1,709 |
28 | Chism Ranch Inc | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $1,703 |
29 | Daling Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $1,654 |
30 | Olive J Brett Trust | Bellingham, WA 98229 | $1,649 |
31 | Gary D Poole | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $1,617 |
32 | Bonita Poole | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $1,617 |
33 | Gene Mcdonald Farms Inc | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $1,562 |
34 | Graydon Painter | Waterville, WA 98858 | $1,561 |
35 | Sherwood J Egbert | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $1,552 |
36 | Murison Farms Joint Venture | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $1,512 |
37 | Rex D Mcgrath | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $1,499 |
38 | Tom Davis Farms Joint Venture | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $1,494 |
39 | State Of Wash Dnr | Ellensburg, WA 98926 | $1,365 |
40 | Rock Rose Farms Inc | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $1,272 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”