Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Douglas County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 47
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Douglas County, Washington totaled $600,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hemmer Ranches Inc | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $81,115 |
2 | Wade W King | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $49,379 |
3 | Egbert Cattle Co LLC | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $45,073 |
4 | , | $42,777 | |
5 | Billingsley Ranch LLC | Palisades, WA 98845 | $40,662 |
6 | Sherwood J Egbert | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $35,898 |
7 | Tower Rock Ranch LLC | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $34,020 |
8 | Sanderson Ranch Inc | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $27,756 |
9 | Wittig Farms LLC | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $25,007 |
10 | Wesley R King | Odessa, WA 99159 | $18,827 |
11 | Sac Enterprises Inc | Almira, WA 99103 | $18,775 |
12 | Cavadini Partnership | Bridgeport, WA 98813 | $15,473 |
13 | Cw Bar Ranches | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $13,324 |
14 | Bromiley Brothers Cattle | East Wenatchee, WA 98802 | $12,908 |
15 | Rafter 20 Ranch Inc | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $12,883 |
16 | Daling Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $10,692 |
17 | Beverly Mclean | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $10,074 |
18 | Eugene H Roth | Palisades, WA 98845 | $9,463 |
19 | Joseph W Ehlers | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $8,982 |
20 | , | $8,524 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>