Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Douglas County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 740
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Douglas County, Washington totaled $10,667,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Buob Farms Inc | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $69,108 |
42 | Michael E Tupling | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $69,095 |
43 | Scott Hunt | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $65,128 |
44 | Kerry & Ward Glessner Ptr K-w Farms Joint Venture | Chelan, WA 98816 | $64,134 |
45 | Thomsen Brothers Partnership | Waterville, WA 98858 | $64,000 |
46 | Daling Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $63,869 |
47 | State Of Wash Dnr | Ellensburg, WA 98926 | $61,943 |
48 | Thomas Stahl | Ellensburg, WA 98926 | $60,841 |
49 | Pixlee Farms Inc | Ephrata, WA 98823 | $59,919 |
50 | D & M Joint Venture | Waterville, WA 98858 | $59,404 |
51 | Baseline Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $58,379 |
52 | Avenell Farms Inc | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $55,415 |
53 | Smith Farms Inc | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $54,986 |
54 | Lo-di Farms Inc | Chelan, WA 98816 | $54,121 |
55 | Rcm Farms LLC | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $53,707 |
56 | Glacier Bank ** | Choteau, MT 59422 | $51,631 |
57 | 4 I Ranch LLC | Waterville, WA 98858 | $51,583 |
58 | Mccray Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $49,913 |
59 | Starbeam Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $49,898 |
60 | C & M Thomsen Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $48,735 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”