Farm Subsidy information
Garfield County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Garfield County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,323
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Garfield County, Washington totaled $221,836,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Watson Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $846,345 |
62 | Max Scoggin | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $843,199 |
63 | R And G Ranches Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $840,056 |
64 | C Thomas Schuster | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $829,484 |
65 | Gary Houser Farming | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $827,150 |
66 | Thomas B Mcgreevy | Vancouver, WA 98662 | $813,081 |
67 | Gilbert Farm Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $804,609 |
68 | Vernon L Kimble | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $797,671 |
69 | Koller-burt Llp | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $795,145 |
70 | Bob Bingman | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $793,955 |
71 | Mike Anderson | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $786,243 |
72 | Tom D Keatts | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $768,327 |
73 | Steve P Flerchinger | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $766,311 |
74 | Patrick J & Donna M Dixon Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $765,683 |
75 | L & M Ranch Inc | Lewiston, ID 83501 | $748,461 |
76 | Deadman Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $742,284 |
77 | Pat S Mckeirnan | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $720,859 |
78 | Wynn Stallcop | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $702,066 |
79 | Sandra J Dixon | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $699,049 |
80 | Virginia A Boyd | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $684,397 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”