Farm Subsidy information
Garfield County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Garfield County, Washington, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 371
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Garfield County, Washington totaled $5,758,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R&r Cox Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $47,912 |
22 | William P & Terrilie K Cox Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $44,487 |
23 | Kirby-zumwalt LLC | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $44,206 |
24 | Hastings Farms | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $44,180 |
25 | Gw Farms Joint Venture | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $43,350 |
26 | Blachly & Sons | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $43,300 |
27 | Kenneth & Debbie Ledgerwood Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $41,828 |
28 | Brian Heitstuman | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $41,538 |
29 | Tetrick Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $41,420 |
30 | Loren & Denise Beale | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $40,050 |
31 | The Kramer Family Trust | Haines, OR 97833 | $38,591 |
32 | Beale Meadow Creek Ranch Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $38,523 |
33 | Roger & Diane Koller Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $37,256 |
34 | Sevengrains Joint Venture | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $36,333 |
35 | Ellis Acres LLC | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $36,330 |
36 | Leland Land & Livestock LLC | Spokane, WA 99223 | $36,256 |
37 | Bjk Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $35,870 |
38 | Roger Dye | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $35,676 |
39 | Pat S Mckeirnan | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $35,155 |
40 | Keatts Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $35,092 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”