Production Flexibility Program in Grant County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,531
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Grant County, Washington totaled $58,457,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Isaak Brothers | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $1,617,401 |
2 | Evergreen Farms Gp | George, WA 98824 | $427,302 |
3 | Heathman Hereford Ranch Gp | Hartline, WA 99135 | $424,562 |
4 | Edwards Brothers Jv | Hartline, WA 99135 | $407,985 |
5 | Roylance Coulee Partnership | Warden, WA 98857 | $407,608 |
6 | Walkers Joint Venture | Hartline, WA 99135 | $390,462 |
7 | Poe Farms Jv | Hartline, WA 99135 | $389,573 |
8 | Hughes Farms Enterprises | Almira, WA 99103 | $367,442 |
9 | Kelley Brothers | Hartline, WA 99135 | $364,474 |
10 | Treat Farms Gp | Warden, WA 98857 | $363,863 |
11 | Sieg Brothers J V | Hartline, WA 99135 | $349,600 |
12 | Dingman Farms Jv | Hartline, WA 99135 | $346,284 |
13 | Marlin Hutterian Brethren | Marlin, WA 98832 | $325,163 |
14 | Ron & Robin Fode Jv | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $305,541 |
15 | Radach Farms Inc | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $290,701 |
16 | Claassen Farms Inc | Marlin, WA 98832 | $289,355 |
17 | Eldon & Judy Clark Jv | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $288,347 |
18 | Tom Pfeifer | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $284,342 |
19 | Chris & Nancy Hyer Jv | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $281,265 |
20 | L & P Farms Inc | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $279,588 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>