Market Loss Assistance Program in Grant County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,398
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Grant County, Washington totaled $30,389,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Radach Farms Inc | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $137,896 |
22 | Isaak Land Inc | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $134,502 |
23 | Pinto Ridge Farms Inc | Wilson Creek, WA 98860 | $134,154 |
24 | Russell Hansen | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $133,869 |
25 | Stevens Farm Jv | Soap Lake, WA 98851 | $133,392 |
26 | Breezy View Farm Jv | Almira, WA 99103 | $132,838 |
27 | Higginbotham Farms Jv | Hartline, WA 99135 | $132,834 |
28 | Leon Baker | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $132,786 |
29 | Lorraine J Baker | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $132,786 |
30 | Thomas Ranch Jv | Hartline, WA 99135 | $128,531 |
31 | Skone & Connors Produce Inc | Warden, WA 98857 | $127,028 |
32 | Sieverkropp Farms Inc | Ephrata, WA 98823 | $126,868 |
33 | Zimmerman Ranch Jv | Almira, WA 99103 | $126,250 |
34 | T & A Enterprises Jv | Ephrata, WA 98823 | $121,430 |
35 | Elder Brothers Jv | Hartline, WA 99135 | $118,658 |
36 | Synergy Acres | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $118,576 |
37 | Schrock Brothers Gp | Hartline, WA 99135 | $116,271 |
38 | Thomas & Thomas Farms Jv | Hartline, WA 99135 | $115,470 |
39 | Dan Piper | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $113,828 |
40 | Norman L Getzinger | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $113,633 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”