Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Grant County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 325
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Grant County, Washington totaled $10,206,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Cp Higgins LLC | Spokane, WA 99223 | $30,517 |
82 | Clarence Overen | Quincy, WA 98848 | $30,178 |
83 | B S Boger Family LLC | Spokane, WA 99201 | $29,755 |
84 | Dan Myers | Soap Lake, WA 98851 | $29,664 |
85 | Wm R Sieg Family LLC | Hartline, WA 99135 | $29,536 |
86 | Carla Friehe | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $29,370 |
87 | Senkler Land Company LLC | Hartline, WA 99135 | $26,968 |
88 | Abs Farms LLC | Ephrata, WA 98823 | $26,740 |
89 | Gary Gross | Wilson Creek, WA 98860 | $26,298 |
90 | Megan Hunsaker | Selah, WA 98942 | $25,785 |
91 | Berend Friehe | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $25,333 |
92 | Thomsen-knopp Inc | Spokane Valley, WA 99214 | $24,799 |
93 | Judy Hunt Woodmansee | Seaside, OR 97138 | $24,283 |
94 | Victory Acres Inc | Hartline, WA 99135 | $23,104 |
95 | Hornbeck Enterprises Inc | Odessa, WA 99159 | $22,756 |
96 | Elva Mae Kane | Ephrata, WA 98823 | $22,475 |
97 | Doris E Boger Megrue LLC | Creston, WA 99117 | $22,205 |
98 | Allen R Boger | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $22,202 |
99 | James O & Helen D Travis Living Trust | Gig Harbor, WA 98332 | $21,702 |
100 | Robert Treiber | Soap Lake, WA 98851 | $21,607 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”