Farm Subsidy information
Grant County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Grant County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 937
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grant County, Washington totaled $45,478,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gil & Henry Farms Inc | Warden, WA 98857 | $153,813 |
22 | L&b Orchards | Quincy, WA 98848 | $151,876 |
23 | Marlin Hutterian Brethren | Marlin, WA 98832 | $148,780 |
24 | Thomas Ranch Jv | Hartline, WA 99135 | $147,338 |
25 | Class A Properties LLC | Quincy, WA 98848 | $146,491 |
26 | Country Daze Inc | Royal City, WA 99357 | $144,462 |
27 | Goetz Wheat Farms Jv | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $142,068 |
28 | Double D Farms Inc | Mattawa, WA 99349 | $131,898 |
29 | Ru-ben Dairy Inc | Ephrata, WA 98823 | $129,816 |
30 | Juergens Brothers Dairy LLC | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $129,121 |
31 | North Star Dairy LLC | Quincy, WA 98848 | $127,577 |
32 | East Basin Ag LLC | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $127,204 |
33 | Tom Downs Farms Inc | Quincy, WA 98848 | $124,850 |
34 | 5 Rivers Ag LLC | Royal City, WA 99357 | $123,144 |
35 | Maughan Feedlot LLC | Mattawa, WA 99349 | $122,579 |
36 | Dieringer Dairy Gp | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $121,962 |
37 | Juan Carlos Valdovinos Zamora | Mattawa, WA 99349 | $121,704 |
38 | Shane Christensen | Royal City, WA 99357 | $121,191 |
39 | Chamberlain Dairy Inc | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $119,392 |
40 | Rg Dairy LLC | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $117,826 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”