Farm Subsidy information
Grays Harbor County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Grays Harbor County, Washington, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 399
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grays Harbor County, Washington totaled $9,106,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | De Aguiar Farms | Oakville, WA 98568 | $97,544 |
22 | Ducks Unlimited | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $84,493 |
23 | Smiley Farms L P | Elma, WA 98541 | $82,117 |
24 | Towle Fisheries Inc | Aberdeen, WA 98520 | $70,791 |
25 | Ryan Towle Enterprises Inc | Westport, WA 98595 | $68,956 |
26 | Andersen Fisheries Inc | Aberdeen, WA 98520 | $68,603 |
27 | Victoria Horton | Oakville, WA 98568 | $67,651 |
28 | Sabrina J Kramer | Taholah, WA 98587 | $66,187 |
29 | Elma Truck & Trailer Inc | Hoquiam, WA 98550 | $63,934 |
30 | Alma Jayne LLC | Mccleary, WA 98557 | $62,605 |
31 | Stedman Fisheries LLC | Aberdeen, WA 98520 | $61,040 |
32 | Daymond Cole | Hoquiam, WA 98550 | $60,841 |
33 | Linda Laffin | Yelm, WA 98597 | $60,622 |
34 | Charles T Ralston | Aberdeen, WA 98520 | $60,223 |
35 | Dave M Melling | Westport, WA 98595 | $60,114 |
36 | Betty Lee III LLC | Cosmopolis, WA 98537 | $59,973 |
37 | Lady Nell LLC | Mccleary, WA 98557 | $56,089 |
38 | John T Dean | Gig Harbor, WA 98335 | $54,054 |
39 | David Mandich | Hoquiam, WA 98550 | $53,976 |
40 | Charles Nation | Hoquiam, WA 98550 | $53,224 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”