Total Commodity Programs in Kitsap County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 179
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Kitsap County, Washington totaled $2,014,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Trentin Cole Moss | Suquamish, WA 98392 | $3,577 |
102 | John Bagley | Poulsbo, WA 98370 | $3,551 |
103 | Rudolph Scott Wellman | Kingston, WA 98346 | $3,339 |
104 | Randolph L Wellman | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,827 |
105 | Desiree Sullivan | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,781 |
106 | Mark Stokke | Olalla, WA 98359 | $2,778 |
107 | Personal Management Services Inc | Poulsbo, WA 98370 | $2,760 |
108 | Jennifer Hess | Port Orchard, WA 98367 | $2,751 |
109 | Jennifer Manning | Port Orchard, WA 98367 | $2,729 |
110 | Barry A Fulton | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,666 |
111 | Joshua John Smith | Suquamish, WA 98392 | $2,623 |
112 | Jeromy Thomas Jones | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,620 |
113 | Luther F Mills III | Indianola, WA 98342 | $2,607 |
114 | Christopher Ronald Jones | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,572 |
115 | Gretar Gudmundsson | Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 | $2,554 |
116 | Bruce D Decoteau | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,509 |
117 | Michael A Reynolds | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,436 |
118 | Michael B Zaiss | Suquamish, WA 98392 | $2,386 |
119 | Carilla Sims | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,333 |
120 | Leah Michelle Symes | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,016 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”