Farm Subsidy information
Klickitat County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Klickitat County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,440
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Klickitat County, Washington totaled $203,434,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Fountain Farm Management LLC | Pasco, WA 99301 | $566,986 |
82 | James A Sizemore | Centerville, WA 98613 | $566,856 |
83 | Winjina LLC | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $555,568 |
84 | Mike Woods | Centerville, WA 98613 | $547,192 |
85 | Mary Ann Mercer | Prosser, WA 99350 | $544,515 |
86 | Quartz Creek Enhancement | Mabton, WA 98935 | $537,439 |
87 | Joe H Shattuck | Roosevelt, WA 99356 | $537,194 |
88 | Mike Thiele | Goldendale, WA 98620 | $526,092 |
89 | Max E Slater | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $525,734 |
90 | Enyeart Family Farms Inc | Goldendale, WA 98620 | $524,501 |
91 | Robert G Imrie | Roosevelt, WA 99356 | $522,216 |
92 | Shang-jen Ko | Cincinnati, OH 45241 | $515,674 |
93 | Sally Amery-anderson | Hood River, OR 97031 | $515,497 |
94 | Riggleman Orchards Inc | White Salmon, WA 98672 | $508,877 |
95 | Davenport Ranches Inc | Goldendale, WA 98620 | $508,169 |
96 | Hoctor Ranches LLC | Goldendale, WA 98620 | $504,810 |
97 | William Mains | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $504,794 |
98 | Keith Jensen | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $502,205 |
99 | Glade Creek Ranch | Prosser, WA 99350 | $499,135 |
100 | S Gale Blankenship | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $498,971 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”