Counter Cyclical Program in Lincoln County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,977
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Lincoln County, Washington totaled $2,317,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Forrest Vold Inc | Sprague, WA 99032 | $8,789 |
42 | J E Douglas Inc | Almira, WA 99103 | $8,754 |
43 | West Hills Jv | Sprague, WA 99032 | $8,722 |
44 | Sherwood Farms Jv | Wilbur, WA 99185 | $8,687 |
45 | Wollweber Farms Inc | Edwall, WA 99008 | $8,616 |
46 | Wm & Jayne Deife Jv | Marlin, WA 98832 | $8,588 |
47 | Jade Farms Inc | Edwall, WA 99008 | $8,563 |
48 | Brides' Valley Ventures | Sprague, WA 99032 | $8,435 |
49 | Buchmann Farms Inc | Airway Heights, WA 99001 | $8,368 |
50 | E & M Williams Inc | Davenport, WA 99122 | $8,342 |
51 | Harding Farms Inc | Sprague, WA 99032 | $8,198 |
52 | Daryl Leipham | Davenport, WA 99122 | $8,036 |
53 | Hughes Farms Enterprises | Almira, WA 99103 | $7,990 |
54 | Thomas J Schultz | Davenport, WA 99122 | $7,885 |
55 | R & K Farms Inc | Edwall, WA 99008 | $7,880 |
56 | Lazy Y J Farms Jv | Reardan, WA 99029 | $7,876 |
57 | A & E Farms Inc | Sprague, WA 99032 | $7,836 |
58 | Llewellyn Farms Inc | Almira, WA 99103 | $7,820 |
59 | S & J Schwartz Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $7,776 |
60 | Naff Farms Inc | Davenport, WA 99122 | $7,732 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”