Loan Deficiency in Lincoln County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,209
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Lincoln County, Washington totaled $26,921,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wyborney Inc | Wilbur, WA 99185 | $118,226 |
22 | A & E Farms Inc | Sprague, WA 99032 | $116,047 |
23 | Kunz Farms Joint Venture | Davenport, WA 99122 | $114,212 |
24 | Wm & Jayne Deife Jv | Marlin, WA 98832 | $113,939 |
25 | Booker & Son Inc | Davenport, WA 99122 | $112,570 |
26 | Wagner Farms Inc | Harrington, WA 99134 | $104,679 |
27 | R B K Joint Venture | Creston, WA 99117 | $103,614 |
28 | Tate J Tate Farms Partnership | Indio, CA 92203 | $100,961 |
29 | Neilsen Farms Joint Venture | Almira, WA 99103 | $100,095 |
30 | Dormaier Brothers Jv | Edwall, WA 99008 | $98,946 |
31 | Harrington Farms Joint Farm | Harrington, WA 99134 | $98,140 |
32 | R & R Farms Jv | Harrington, WA 99134 | $97,825 |
33 | Haden Farms Jv | Wilbur, WA 99185 | $94,447 |
34 | Ladwig Farms Jv | Almira, WA 99103 | $94,304 |
35 | Schorzman Farms Jv | Marlin, WA 98832 | $93,627 |
36 | Sheffels Company | Wilbur, WA 99185 | $92,349 |
37 | Groh Farms Jv | Almira, WA 99103 | $91,743 |
38 | Mielke Brothers Gp | Davenport, WA 99122 | $87,951 |
39 | Kuchenbuch & Sons Joint Venture | Wilbur, WA 99185 | $87,896 |
40 | Quirk Farms Inc | Wilbur, WA 99185 | $87,565 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”