Total Commodity Programs in Mason County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 189
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mason County, Washington totaled $2,388,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Vincent Henry Sr | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,593 |
82 | Raymond Michael Auld | Skokomish Nation, WA 98584 | $2,570 |
83 | Gavino Tiger Tinaza | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,559 |
84 | Bear J Lewis | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,486 |
85 | Redwolf S Krise | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,472 |
86 | Hattie Cecil Peterson-willams | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,438 |
87 | Todd Hagmann Jr | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,432 |
88 | Dakodah Vigil | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,432 |
89 | Jessica Cruz | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,432 |
90 | Gomez Shellfish, LLC | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,409 |
91 | Paul William Peterson Jr | Skokomish Nation, WA 98584 | $2,404 |
92 | Olympic Shellfish LLC | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,383 |
93 | Paul William Peterson Sr | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,370 |
94 | Tom Pulsifer Jr | Skokomish, WA 98584 | $2,314 |
95 | Andrew Dean Whitener | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,280 |
96 | Tamatha D Ford | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,280 |
97 | Michael S Henderson Sr | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,280 |
98 | Rose Marie Krise | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,280 |
99 | Rose Marie Blue Back | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,280 |
100 | Tully Kruger | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,280 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”