Total Commodity Programs in Mason County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 170
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mason County, Washington totaled $1,528,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Dale Redhawk Laclair | Skokomish Nation, WA 98584 | $2,196 |
102 | Bud Frank Wilbur | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,156 |
103 | Shilo Peterson | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,092 |
104 | Olympic Shellfish LLC | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,072 |
105 | Travis S Prest | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,072 |
106 | Franklin Cousins Jr | Lilliwaup, WA 98555 | $2,069 |
107 | Meloney Rose Hause | Olympia, WA 98508 | $2,052 |
108 | Robert J Jones | Shelton, WA 98584 | $2,052 |
109 | Llyod Dean Wilbur Jr | Skokomish Nation, WA 98584 | $2,005 |
110 | Christopher Lawrence Tinaza | Skokomish Nation, WA 98584 | $1,996 |
111 | Virginia May Berumen | Shelton, WA 98584 | $1,982 |
112 | Margie G Gouley | Skokomish Nation, WA 98584 | $1,889 |
113 | Jearid D Williams | Shelton, WA 98584 | $1,889 |
114 | Misti Fawn Martinez | Shelton, WA 98584 | $1,858 |
115 | Skylar R Miller | Skokomish, WA 98584 | $1,852 |
116 | Norton Wascher | Lilliwaup, WA 98555 | $1,832 |
117 | Trevor Peterson Jr | Shelton, WA 98584 | $1,811 |
118 | Norma Jane Cagey | Skokomish, WA 98584 | $1,749 |
119 | Kevin Joseph Cagey | Skokomish, WA 98584 | $1,715 |
120 | Andy Tinaza | Skokomish, WA 98584 | $1,713 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”