Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Skagit County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 82
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Skagit County, Washington totaled $4,824,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Amf Farms Inc | Burlington, WA 98233 | $68,608 |
22 | Treehouse Produce Inc | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $65,196 |
23 | Swanson Bros | Mount Vernon, WA 98274 | $51,098 |
24 | Kruse Farms Inc | La Conner, WA 98257 | $49,442 |
25 | Johnson Farms Inc | Stanwood, WA 98292 | $49,037 |
26 | Robert N Dowen | Bow, WA 98232 | $47,682 |
27 | Gary Johnson | Stanwood, WA 98292 | $46,070 |
28 | Tim Prager | Anacortes, WA 98221 | $45,238 |
29 | Bay Baby Produce Inc | Burlington, WA 98233 | $41,717 |
30 | C J's Potatoes LLC | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $39,411 |
31 | Bob Dog Produce Inc | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $36,732 |
32 | Daniel M Sakuma | Sacramento, CA 95821 | $35,595 |
33 | Nolan Lee | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $34,763 |
34 | J4 Ranch LLC | Seattle, WA 98115 | $33,186 |
35 | Wendell I Carlson | Bow, WA 98232 | $33,064 |
36 | Harold Pierson & Sons Inc | Burlington, WA 98233 | $31,215 |
37 | Mcmoran Farms | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $30,132 |
38 | Steve Larson | La Conner, WA 98257 | $29,029 |
39 | D Youngquist Farms | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $28,017 |
40 | Jerry C Nelson | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $26,698 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”