Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Skagit County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 182
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Skagit County, Washington totaled $4,793,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Branko C Jurkovich | La Conner, WA 98257 | $14,070 |
82 | Schwabe Fisheries LLC | La Conner, WA 98257 | $14,026 |
83 | Trevor Gatter | Anacortes, WA 98221 | $13,642 |
84 | Abraham J Verdoes | Anacortes, WA 98221 | $13,430 |
85 | John W Skeele | Sitka, AK 99835 | $12,674 |
86 | Brandon J Franulovic | Anacortes, WA 98221 | $12,646 |
87 | Kenneth L Crews | Anacortes, WA 98221 | $12,597 |
88 | Edward G Brock Jr | Mount Vernon, WA 98274 | $12,364 |
89 | Jeremy J Wilbur | La Conner, WA 98257 | $12,290 |
90 | Wayne Cayou | La Conner, WA 98257 | $12,209 |
91 | Lady Mary Corp | Shoreline, WA 98177 | $12,154 |
92 | Garrett Wilbur | La Conner, WA 98257 | $10,713 |
93 | Anthony Scott Charles | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $10,380 |
94 | John C Grossglass Iv | La Conner, WA 98257 | $10,363 |
95 | Cy Fenton | Anacortes, WA 98221 | $10,307 |
96 | Steve Lauderback | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $10,251 |
97 | Michael Wilbur Jr | La Conner, WA 98257 | $10,075 |
98 | Michael L Charles | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $10,031 |
99 | Joseph Williams | La Conner, WA 98257 | $9,835 |
100 | April Mary Wilbur | La Conner, WA 98257 | $9,824 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”