Farm Subsidy information
Skagit County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Skagit County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 918
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Skagit County, Washington totaled $77,786,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Skagit County | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $191,120 |
82 | Victor Benson | Mount Vernon, WA 98274 | $188,529 |
83 | John G Thulen | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $187,937 |
84 | Washington Alder LLC | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $182,625 |
85 | Rockalli Farms | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $181,999 |
86 | Kenneth Kaaland | Sedro Woolley, WA 98284 | $180,347 |
87 | Sterling Dairy LLC | Bellevue, WA 98007 | $179,154 |
88 | George Thelen | Bow, WA 98232 | $178,448 |
89 | Andrew W Young Sr | Sedro Woolley, WA 98284 | $174,613 |
90 | Knutzen Brothers Farm | Burlington, WA 98233 | $173,961 |
91 | Michael F Bell | Bow, WA 98232 | $173,671 |
92 | William L Strom | Vancouver, WA 98682 | $173,518 |
93 | Bollema Dairy/jake | Ephrata, WA 98823 | $172,094 |
94 | Donald Moe | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $170,150 |
95 | Herbert F &/or Judy Hansen | Sedro Woolley, WA 98284 | $169,155 |
96 | Davery Fisheries LLC | Anacortes, WA 98221 | $166,910 |
97 | Derek John Blanken | Sedro Woolley, WA 98284 | $166,724 |
98 | D & D Seed Company | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $166,262 |
99 | Robert Vanpelt | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $164,390 |
100 | Steve Larson | La Conner, WA 98257 | $161,943 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”