Conservation Reserve Program in Skagit County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 133
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Skagit County, Washington totaled $6,672,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Robert Sjoboen | Anacortes, WA 98221 | $33,236 |
62 | Samish Indian Nation | Anacortes, WA 98221 | $33,024 |
63 | Michael D Sollars | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $31,612 |
64 | Kathleen Vojkovich-bombard | Avalon, CA 90704 | $31,074 |
65 | David Michael Miller | Sedro Woolley, WA 98284 | $29,363 |
66 | W J Smith | Snohomish, WA 98290 | $29,223 |
67 | Roxanna Valdovinos | Sedro-woolley, WA 98284 | $28,619 |
68 | Devries Dairy Lp | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $27,224 |
69 | Tarie M Benson | Sedro Woolley, WA 98284 | $26,642 |
70 | Jesse F Berger | Concrete, WA 98237 | $26,319 |
71 | River Run Farm LLC | Concrete, WA 98237 | $26,061 |
72 | Robert A Shapiro | Bow, WA 98232 | $25,417 |
73 | Country Cousins | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $25,297 |
74 | Ladonna Strinden | Sedro Woolley, WA 98284 | $25,184 |
75 | Kees Hofman | Mount Vernon, WA 98273 | $24,497 |
76 | Bruce A Johnson | Sedro Woolley, WA 98284 | $24,070 |
77 | Jeffrey Basham | Sedro Woolley, WA 98284 | $23,006 |
78 | Acme Properties LLC | Kirkland, WA 98033 | $21,190 |
79 | Daniel Madlung | Burlington, WA 98233 | $20,708 |
80 | Adam L Jewell | Sedro Woolley, WA 98284 | $20,609 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”