Farm Subsidy information
Spokane County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Spokane County, Washington, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 587
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Spokane County, Washington totaled $15,331,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Valley Living Trust | Cheney, WA 99004 | $21,836 |
122 | Roy Emtman Family LLC | Valleyford, WA 99036 | $21,099 |
123 | Donald C Hyslop | Reardan, WA 99029 | $19,578 |
124 | Durheim LLC | Mead, WA 99021 | $19,289 |
125 | Dunrenton Ranch LLC | Deer Park, WA 99006 | $18,986 |
126 | Plaza Land Company LLC | Colfax, WA 99111 | $18,001 |
127 | Brash Ranch | Spangle, WA 99031 | $17,883 |
128 | Lawrence J Tee | Latah, WA 99018 | $17,837 |
129 | Gary Fricke | Rockford, WA 99030 | $17,743 |
130 | R E Nelson Co | Spokane, WA 99223 | $17,358 |
131 | Utecht Farms & Produce Inc | Spokane Valley, WA 99037 | $17,210 |
132 | Kent N Sooy Revocable Trust | Cheney, WA 99004 | $17,035 |
133 | Bafus Land Enterprises LLC | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $16,911 |
134 | Robert Felber Jr | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $16,616 |
135 | Brett & Bryan, L.l.c. | Bellevue, WA 98008 | $16,493 |
136 | Country Heritage LLC | Wilbur, WA 99185 | $16,217 |
137 | Betty Mithoug Trust | Rockford, WA 99030 | $15,637 |
138 | Brakon Corp | Spangle, WA 99031 | $15,512 |
139 | Chad Hansen | Farmington, WA 99128 | $15,497 |
140 | Joseph H Delaney | Seattle, WA 98105 | $15,321 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”