Conservation Reserve Program in Spokane County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,203
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Spokane County, Washington totaled $50,259,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mittelstaedt Farms Inc | Post Falls, ID 83854 | $1,265,884 |
2 | Constantin E Petropoulos | Spokane, WA 99219 | $970,406 |
3 | Spokane Hutterian Brethren Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $844,987 |
4 | James R Ryan | Nine Mile Falls, WA 99026 | $774,785 |
5 | View Point Farm Inc | Rockford, WA 99030 | $738,007 |
6 | Venture 6 LLC | Spokane, WA 99224 | $708,796 |
7 | Beverly K Berger | Tekoa, WA 99033 | $614,252 |
8 | Larry D Wilcox | Cheney, WA 99004 | $602,517 |
9 | Michael L Breidenbach | Spangle, WA 99031 | $550,014 |
10 | Gordon Sires | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $536,275 |
11 | Gary Belsby Farming & Ranching Corp | Cheney, WA 99004 | $530,053 |
12 | Thomas W Showalter | Cheney, WA 99004 | $527,688 |
13 | Freter Farms Gp | Valleyford, WA 99036 | $508,429 |
14 | Charles Keno | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $504,515 |
15 | State Of Wash Dnr | Ellensburg, WA 98926 | $499,922 |
16 | L Double C Ranch Inc | Cheney, WA 99004 | $476,810 |
17 | Mondovi LLC | Davenport, WA 99122 | $441,520 |
18 | Frances-steel Family Steel | Reardan, WA 99029 | $432,384 |
19 | Lambert & Son Trust | Veradale, WA 99037 | $424,321 |
20 | Walter E Radmer | Medical Lake, WA 99022 | $408,458 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>