Total Conservation Programs in Walla Walla County, Washington, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 389
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Walla Walla County, Washington totaled $7,851,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Three Bowe Farms | Prescott, WA 99348 | $423,177 |
2 | , | $337,340 | |
3 | Woodward Canyon Land Co II | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $250,113 |
4 | Lang-mour Joint Venture | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $235,980 |
5 | Grimm-davis Farms | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $177,930 |
6 | Cline Clyde Ranch | Vancouver, WA 98687 | $170,770 |
7 | Fernwood Ranch Joint Venture | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $154,438 |
8 | J Hair Farms Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $142,327 |
9 | Michael Hand Farms Jv | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $99,386 |
10 | Collard Heirs Farm Agency | Spokane Valley, WA 99216 | $91,631 |
11 | Rifle Ridge Joint Venture | Prescott, WA 99348 | $88,796 |
12 | U & H Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $81,312 |
13 | Bradley B Carpenter | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $75,980 |
14 | Gorham Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $69,909 |
15 | Charles P Reininger | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $65,819 |
16 | Leroy-beaver Farms | Temecula, CA 92591 | $64,672 |
17 | Giacomo Farm | Touchet, WA 99360 | $57,920 |
18 | Tracy Reininger | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $53,407 |
19 | Kelly Tucker | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $53,407 |
20 | , | $53,407 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>