Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Walla Walla County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 584
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Walla Walla County, Washington totaled $23,705,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | 4cs | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $212,400 |
22 | Three D Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $211,820 |
23 | Struthers Farms Inc | Prescott, WA 99348 | $188,149 |
24 | Chvatal Farms Inc | Touchet, WA 99360 | $179,625 |
25 | Fred Sherry Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $178,615 |
26 | Robert Rea | Touchet, WA 99360 | $173,286 |
27 | J Hair Farms Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $172,688 |
28 | Bi-kay Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $172,338 |
29 | Jackaroo LLC | Smith, NV 89430 | $171,959 |
30 | R D F Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $171,567 |
31 | W R Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $168,253 |
32 | Terry Bergevin | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $160,600 |
33 | Walkley Farms LLC | Pasco, WA 99301 | $158,888 |
34 | Walters Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $157,051 |
35 | Mobile Systems Inc | Prescott, WA 99348 | $149,778 |
36 | Webb Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $148,616 |
37 | Peterson Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $147,371 |
38 | Konag Co | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $144,244 |
39 | M G P Farming | Prescott, WA 99348 | $138,900 |
40 | Greg Ferrel LLC | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $137,766 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”