Conservation Reserve Program in Walla Walla County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,414
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Walla Walla County, Washington totaled $239,109,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Skirvin Farms | Philomath, OR 97370 | $565,014 |
122 | S R Wasser | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $557,537 |
123 | Walthew Farms | Prescott, WA 99348 | $546,165 |
124 | Hampton Hills Investment Group | Temecula, CA 92591 | $545,249 |
125 | Sheila K Hair | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $538,284 |
126 | Michael E Fredrickson | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $534,321 |
127 | Chris Kregger | Touchet, WA 99360 | $532,189 |
128 | Webb Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $524,692 |
129 | Joe Taylor | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $523,864 |
130 | Magallon And Magallon | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $522,893 |
131 | Maiden Ag | Touchet, WA 99360 | $522,879 |
132 | J L Robinson LLC | Kennewick, WA 99337 | $522,443 |
133 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $514,539 |
134 | Eureka Flats LLC | Prescott, WA 99348 | $508,719 |
135 | Luckenbill Farms Inc | Ione, OR 97843 | $499,805 |
136 | Frances A West | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $498,309 |
137 | Karen L Jochen | Yakima, WA 98908 | $497,408 |
138 | Julie Taylor | San Diego, CA 92104 | $496,791 |
139 | Sandhill Farming Inc | Ione, OR 97843 | $494,333 |
140 | Kay F Wessel | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $493,161 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”