Farm Subsidy information
Walla Walla County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Walla Walla County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 3,273
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Walla Walla County, Washington totaled $653,850,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | John E Hair II | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $751,519 |
182 | William H Crow | Wilbur, WA 99185 | $744,922 |
183 | Dorothy M Crow | Wilbur, WA 99185 | $744,920 |
184 | Don L Buckley | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $740,695 |
185 | Blanc Land & Livestock Co | Pasco, WA 99302 | $739,616 |
186 | D & P Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $739,416 |
187 | William M Parker | Lowden, WA 99360 | $736,899 |
188 | Emerald Farms Joint Venture | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $733,348 |
189 | Stonecipher Ranches LLC | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $731,640 |
190 | Kent Land Company Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $730,188 |
191 | Karen Wolf | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $726,411 |
192 | Jesse Mc Caw | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $711,842 |
193 | Sandra L Buckley | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $710,119 |
194 | , | $707,783 | |
195 | Maiden Company LLC | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $705,796 |
196 | Baumann Ranch | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $704,212 |
197 | Byerley Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $702,987 |
198 | Casey Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $699,562 |
199 | Darell D Weathermon | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $698,900 |
200 | J T D Ranch Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $698,690 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”