Farm Subsidy information
Walla Walla County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Walla Walla County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,273
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Walla Walla County, Washington totaled $653,850,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Three Bowe Farms | Prescott, WA 99348 | $6,380,182 |
| 2 | Zmi Joint Venture | Washougal, WA 98671 | $5,665,972 |
| 3 | J Hair Farms Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $4,676,836 |
| 4 | Brown & Ford Ranch | Prescott, WA 99348 | $4,393,012 |
| 5 | John Grant And Son | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $4,157,059 |
| 6 | Fernwood Ranch Joint Venture | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $4,103,161 |
| 7 | Walla Walla Farms Partnership | Sterling, CO 80751 | $3,945,785 |
| 8 | C & C Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $3,522,411 |
| 9 | Tompkins Brothers | Prescott, WA 99348 | $3,371,165 |
| 10 | Woodward Canyon Land Co II | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $3,281,197 |
| 11 | Rifle Ridge Joint Venture | Prescott, WA 99348 | $2,947,538 |
| 12 | T-star Partnership | Dayton, WA 99328 | $2,918,476 |
| 13 | G & A Smith Farms | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $2,903,605 |
| 14 | Walters Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $2,902,575 |
| 15 | Hair Land Co | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $2,779,299 |
| 16 | Oasis Fruit LLC | Tieton, WA 98947 | $2,675,163 |
| 17 | 2 M Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $2,662,659 |
| 18 | Kenco Joint Venture | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $2,643,772 |
| 19 | Kontos Co | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $2,611,827 |
| 20 | W R Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $2,589,839 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
