Conservation Reserve Program in Walla Walla County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,414
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Walla Walla County, Washington totaled $239,109,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Linda R Fleming | Richmond, VA 23238 | $1,001,375 |
42 | Fernwood Ranch Joint Venture | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $998,615 |
43 | Whitman College | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $991,722 |
44 | Robert Rea | Touchet, WA 99360 | $984,029 |
45 | Blacklaw Brothers Inc | Polson, MT 59860 | $975,240 |
46 | Hampton Hills Financial Group | Vancouver, WA 98683 | $974,232 |
47 | Linn N Buley | Prescott, WA 99348 | $970,773 |
48 | Fred Hair | Prescott, WA 99348 | $958,144 |
49 | Cheryl Hair | Prescott, WA 99348 | $958,143 |
50 | Tompkins & Sons Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $957,130 |
51 | Flat Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $957,126 |
52 | Rea Farms Inc | Touchet, WA 99360 | $953,663 |
53 | Constance K Martin | Rufus, OR 97050 | $951,008 |
54 | Natalie S Fredrickson | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $941,572 |
55 | Fletcher Farms | Prescott, WA 99348 | $939,527 |
56 | William H Rieckmann | Hillsboro, OR 97123 | $935,954 |
57 | Charles P Reininger | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $933,577 |
58 | William Frazier | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $926,144 |
59 | Jay Tucker | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $916,948 |
60 | Bar Ten Ranches LLC | Milton Freewater, OR 97862 | $914,540 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”