Production Flexibility Program in Walla Walla County, Washington, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,578
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Walla Walla County, Washington totaled $57,068,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Monarch Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $335,931 |
22 | Mc Gough Ranches | Prescott, WA 99348 | $325,448 |
23 | Erwin Brothers II | Prescott, WA 99348 | $319,974 |
24 | Stueckle Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $312,380 |
25 | Meadow Lake Farm | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $310,328 |
26 | Herb Garms Estate | Smith, NV 89430 | $304,169 |
27 | J Hair Farms Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $300,410 |
28 | Matt Lyons Inc | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $297,382 |
29 | Maybe Next Year Enterprises | Prescott, WA 99348 | $294,560 |
30 | Zuger Ranch | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $290,558 |
31 | Three D Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $285,236 |
32 | Baumann Ranch | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $280,970 |
33 | Ntn Ranches | Dayton, WA 99328 | $272,962 |
34 | Frank Hart & Sons Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $272,654 |
35 | Webb Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $271,222 |
36 | Bi-kay Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $270,354 |
37 | Howard P Smith Ranch | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $270,320 |
38 | Small Ranches Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $268,628 |
39 | George A Struthers | Prescott, WA 99348 | $267,380 |
40 | 2 M Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $265,840 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”