Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Whatcom County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 117
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Whatcom County, Washington totaled $2,618,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | T J Veenacre Farms Inc | Lynden, WA 98264 | $36,375 |
22 | R Bajema Farm Inc | Lynden, WA 98264 | $36,000 |
23 | Lar-a-lin Dairy LLC | Custer, WA 98240 | $35,869 |
24 | Steve Hovander | Ferndale, WA 98248 | $35,000 |
25 | Kenneth C Bosscher | Everson, WA 98247 | $34,107 |
26 | Countryside Dairy | Ferndale, WA 98248 | $31,444 |
27 | Terrence De Valois | Lynden, WA 98264 | $31,271 |
28 | Bouma Farms Inc | Lynden, WA 98264 | $31,123 |
29 | De Haan Dairy | Lynden, WA 98264 | $30,723 |
30 | Swede Hill Farm Inc | Lynden, WA 98264 | $30,418 |
31 | Vanderveen Dairy LLC | Lynden, WA 98264 | $29,246 |
32 | Nooksack Indian Tribe | Deming, WA 98244 | $28,753 |
33 | Paul Dairy Inc | Custer, WA 98240 | $28,440 |
34 | Veen Huizen Farms LLC | Everson, WA 98247 | $28,415 |
35 | Moser Farms Inc | Ferndale, WA 98248 | $27,864 |
36 | Theo Van Berkum | Everson, WA 98247 | $27,800 |
37 | Kip Dunlap | Nooksack, WA 98276 | $27,157 |
38 | Van Weerdhuizen Dairy LLC | Sumas, WA 98295 | $27,000 |
39 | Rodney J De Jong | Lynden, WA 98264 | $26,370 |
40 | Lucas J Vos | Everson, WA 98247 | $25,940 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”