Farm Subsidy information
Whatcom County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Whatcom County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 592
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Whatcom County, Washington totaled $13,510,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Legoe Bay Shellfish LLC | Lummi Island, WA 98262 | $16,428 |
142 | Duane M Jacoby Irrevocable Trust | Acme, WA 98220 | $16,376 |
143 | West Berry Farm LLC | Lynden, WA 98264 | $15,724 |
144 | Malwa Berry Farm LLC | Sumas, WA 98295 | $15,443 |
145 | William R Tate | Acme, WA 98220 | $15,253 |
146 | T L & Sons Farm LLC | Sumas, WA 98295 | $15,127 |
147 | Lagerwey Dairy Farm, LLC | Lynden, WA 98264 | $14,771 |
148 | Peter Brady Mayson | Custer, WA 98240 | $14,443 |
149 | Albert Huizenga | Lynden, WA 98264 | $14,138 |
150 | Berendsen Property Holdings LLC | Everson, WA 98247 | $14,102 |
151 | Betty Lee Honrud | Custer, WA 98240 | $14,059 |
152 | Two Sisters LLC | Bellingham, WA 98225 | $14,054 |
153 | Laird Dairy LLC | Ferndale, WA 98248 | $14,043 |
154 | Stephen G. Pabody | Ferndale, WA 98248 | $14,035 |
155 | Woomera LLC | Bellingham, WA 98229 | $14,030 |
156 | A B Blueberry Farm LLC | Bellingham, WA 98226 | $14,001 |
157 | Erick Bendure | Bellingham, WA 98226 | $13,896 |
158 | Charles 0 Baker | Lummi Island, WA 98262 | $13,688 |
159 | J Timothy Slater | Bellingham, WA 98226 | $13,629 |
160 | R2gs LLC | Custer, WA 98240 | $13,156 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”