Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Whitman County, Washington, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 100
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Whitman County, Washington totaled $894,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Elroy Brewer | Colton, WA 99113 | $4,845 |
42 | Chris Roy Grassl | Uniontown, WA 99179 | $4,574 |
43 | , | $4,444 | |
44 | Kathlyn Heaton | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $4,406 |
45 | Henning Family Farms Inc | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $4,320 |
46 | Bonnie Lake Land & Livestock Inc | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $4,279 |
47 | Marvin Lamb | Endicott, WA 99125 | $4,001 |
48 | Chad Pierson | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $3,994 |
49 | Douglas W Stout | Genesee, ID 83832 | $3,900 |
50 | Justin Heaton | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $3,717 |
51 | Jill Pierson | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $3,614 |
52 | John Joseph Miller Ranch LLC | Sammamish, WA 98074 | $3,535 |
53 | D & C St John's Crooked Creek Farm Inc | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $3,290 |
54 | Rrp Properties LLC | Garfield, WA 99130 | $3,184 |
55 | Stephen M Maki | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $2,824 |
56 | Rocking Arrow K Ranch Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $2,790 |
57 | Lois Barry | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $2,588 |
58 | D R Morton Inc | Lamont, WA 99017 | $2,306 |
59 | Charmaine Despain | Endicott, WA 99125 | $2,106 |
60 | Heather K Siegel | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $1,781 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”