Production Flexibility Program in Whitman County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,292
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Whitman County, Washington totaled $133,370,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | N E Farms Gp | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $280,683 |
42 | Flying F Farms LLC | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $280,616 |
43 | Harlow Farms Inc | Pullman, WA 99163 | $275,984 |
44 | Larry Hood | Pullman, WA 99163 | $274,734 |
45 | Bar Star Inc | Colton, WA 99113 | $274,259 |
46 | Nelson Farms Inc | Farmington, WA 99128 | $274,187 |
47 | Nervig Farms Inc | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $272,586 |
48 | Ron Kilpatrick | Oakesdale, WA 99158 | $270,074 |
49 | Stubbs Farms LLC | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $266,849 |
50 | Phil R Druffel Inc | Colton, WA 99113 | $264,621 |
51 | Kamiak Grain Co Inc | Palouse, WA 99161 | $262,981 |
52 | Lazy M Farms LLC | Colfax, WA 99111 | $262,553 |
53 | Steve Camp | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $261,173 |
54 | Mark Richter | Endicott, WA 99125 | $259,411 |
55 | Bob Morton Inc | Lamont, WA 99017 | $259,048 |
56 | Robert Davis Ltd | Pullman, WA 99163 | $258,112 |
57 | Crider Farms Inc | Oakesdale, WA 99158 | $257,912 |
58 | Randal Repp | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $257,213 |
59 | Diamond Lazy L Ranches Inc | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $255,501 |
60 | Koenig Land Co Inc | Colfax, WA 99111 | $254,755 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”