Total Conservation Programs in Whitman County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,005
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Whitman County, Washington totaled $299,692,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lm Farms Jv | Saint John, WA 99171 | $892,492 |
42 | Lynn E Nelson | Colfax, WA 99111 | $877,842 |
43 | Jeannie Riley | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $873,890 |
44 | C & M Farms Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $872,108 |
45 | Kdr Ranch Gp | Hay, WA 99136 | $871,085 |
46 | K L B Farms Inc | Richland, WA 99352 | $864,589 |
47 | D & R Cox Farms Inc | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $863,274 |
48 | Alc Farms Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $853,408 |
49 | W D Cattle Co Inc | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $846,676 |
50 | Roger D Daniel | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $845,690 |
51 | Loretta Daniel | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $845,383 |
52 | Cole Farms Jv | Saint John, WA 99171 | $840,352 |
53 | Dave Mcintosh | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $836,427 |
54 | Jon Cox | Hay, WA 99136 | $836,220 |
55 | Nor-will Farms Inc | Liberty Lake, WA 99019 | $832,982 |
56 | Xb Ranch Inc | Endicott, WA 99125 | $826,564 |
57 | Fennimore Ranch Lp | Renton, WA 98059 | $821,236 |
58 | A Lynn Bruce | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $816,870 |
59 | Thera On The Palouse Inc | Spokane, WA 99223 | $813,443 |
60 | Bernt Lehn Farms Inc | Farmington, WA 99128 | $810,306 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”