Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Whitman County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,504
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Whitman County, Washington totaled $11,766,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Henning Family Farms Inc | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $36,826 |
62 | Kirk E Dugger | Palouse, WA 99161 | $36,223 |
63 | Mellissa Dugger | Palouse, WA 99161 | $36,223 |
64 | Mcneilly Ranch Inc | Colfax, WA 99111 | $35,652 |
65 | M & L LLC | Oakesdale, WA 99158 | $35,371 |
66 | Justin Heaton | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $35,204 |
67 | Hodges Farms Inc | Oakesdale, WA 99158 | $35,149 |
68 | Jacob Cloninger | Garfield, WA 99130 | $34,924 |
69 | Boone Brothers | Pullman, WA 99163 | $34,781 |
70 | Double J Farms | Garfield, WA 99130 | $34,293 |
71 | Kamiak Creek Farms Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $33,936 |
72 | Todd Imeson | Colfax, WA 99111 | $33,040 |
73 | Rock Valley Ranch Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $32,514 |
74 | Mader Enterprises Inc | Pullman, WA 99163 | $32,499 |
75 | Morasch Farms Inc | Endicott, WA 99125 | $32,486 |
76 | R & J Land & Livestock Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $32,314 |
77 | Jon Semingson | Pullman, WA 99163 | $32,213 |
78 | Jiggs D Anderson | Garfield, WA 99130 | $31,957 |
79 | Jeff M Anderson | Pullman, WA 99163 | $31,922 |
80 | Hodges 1905, Inc | Oakesdale, WA 99158 | $31,903 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”