Farm Subsidy information
Whitman County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Whitman County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,091
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Whitman County, Washington totaled $46,001,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mike Zimmer | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $90,659 |
82 | Kamiak Creek Farms Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $90,116 |
83 | Lorie Zimmer | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $89,854 |
84 | Cloaninger Farms Gp | Colfax, WA 99111 | $88,815 |
85 | 4 Livestock LLC | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $88,663 |
86 | Richard W Nelson | Colfax, WA 99111 | $88,379 |
87 | M & L LLC | Oakesdale, WA 99158 | $88,167 |
88 | Craig L Cox | Colfax, WA 99111 | $88,050 |
89 | D & M Lange Jv | Pullman, WA 99163 | $87,214 |
90 | R A W Farms Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $87,142 |
91 | Kc Wigen Farms Jv | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $86,523 |
92 | H Jacobs Farms Inc | Uniontown, WA 99179 | $86,320 |
93 | Sdk Farms Inc | Garfield, WA 99130 | $86,178 |
94 | Mader Enterprises Inc | Pullman, WA 99163 | $86,070 |
95 | Morasch Farms Inc | Endicott, WA 99125 | $86,016 |
96 | Eden Valley Jv | Garfield, WA 99130 | $85,324 |
97 | Box 4-s Ranch Inc | Pullman, WA 99163 | $85,292 |
98 | A E Knott Farms Inc | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $84,526 |
99 | B And M Farms Inc | Colfax, WA 99111 | $83,680 |
100 | Christopher Schultheis Inc | Colton, WA 99113 | $82,832 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”